Mazur set out to gauge the effectiveness of his teaching scientifically. He employed a standardized test known as the Force Concept Inventory (FCI) to assess his students' conceptual understanding of mechanics, before and after teaching his courses. The results surprised him.
He was not surprised that most students entering his class came in with a relatively weak understanding of mechanics. He was, however, astounded that after having taken his mechanics course, his students performed only marginally better on the FCI. Mazur was dumbfounded. In the years that followed, he set out to determine, scientifically, what constitutes effective pedagogy for science education.
Traditional lectures, where a teacher communicates information to students who dutifully take note of the content, are fairly useless. At its best, such an approach can be entertaining, but not cognitively stimulating for students. In fact, cognitive function in students while attending a lecture (even a good one) has been shown to be lower than while sleeping. In this context, who can fault a student for sleeping through a lecture?
Traditional lectures, where a teacher communicates information to students who dutifully take note of the content, are fairly useless. At its best, such an approach can be entertaining, but not cognitively stimulating for students. In fact, cognitive function in students while attending a lecture (even a good one) has been shown to be lower than while sleeping. In this context, who can fault a student for sleeping through a lecture?