I know I should be writing about day 3 here, but yesterday, after submitting my day 2 entry, I attended perhaps the most compelling symposium of the conference; it was all about manned missions to Mars. I can say with some confidence that nothing today will top it, so this entry will focus entirely on the exciting presentations that took place yesterday afternoon.
Most of the conference rooms hold about 150 people in it, and it is rare that a room is more than half full. But I had a feeling that this symposium about Mars missions would draw interest, and sure enough, it spilled out the back of the room. The first few talks were rather benign: A plan to land on Mars by 2030, recommendations by several experts in the field on planning the first mission, and a commentary on the social and legal structure of the first Martian society (nothing more compelling than reading the novel Red Mars).
The fourth presentation was introduced by the session chair as 'something special', and he was right. Five students from M.I.T. wrote a paper challenging the proposal for Mars One.
Learning science is one of the hardest things a person can do. It often forces us to shift the way in which we see the world. The process is demanding, but is ultimately rewarding, because it allows us to interact with nature in a deeper, more meaningful way. If we continue down this road, we become empowered with the means to shape our environment - we become engineers.
Showing posts with label Mars One. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mars One. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 1, 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)