Well, what a difference a year, and a trip to Mars, can make. This week, NASA's one ton rover suitably named Curiosity began cruising around Mars following an eight month long voyage through the solar system. As the first pictures of the red planet reached our blue one, it became clear immediately: NASA was back.
Learning science is one of the hardest things a person can do. It often forces us to shift the way in which we see the world. The process is demanding, but is ultimately rewarding, because it allows us to interact with nature in a deeper, more meaningful way. If we continue down this road, we become empowered with the means to shape our environment - we become engineers.
Showing posts with label NASA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NASA. Show all posts
Thursday, August 9, 2012
Curiosity: How NASA Got its Groove Back
If NASA were a prize fighter, few would have been lining up to place bets on it in recent years. The American space agency suffered a metaphorical TKO in 2011 as its shuttle program came to an end. From that point onward, in order to send American astronauts to the International Space Station, the US government would need to rent some seats aboard a Russian spacecraft. This position of dependence that the one time unrivaled space faring nation found itself in seemed to indicate that NASA had lost its mojo.
Wednesday, March 23, 2011
NASA vs. CSA
Nearly everyone on planet Earth has heard of the organization called NASA. They may not know that NASA stands for National Aeronautics and Space Administration, but they do know that it runs the world’s most successful space program. Though founded in 1958, NASA was immortalized in 1969, when it sent a man to the surface of the moon. The event was the landmark of the twentieth century, and cemented the United States as the world leader in space exploration.
The economic benefits that the United States reaped from its lunar landing cannot be overstated. Leaders in aerospace are leaders in technology, and leaders in technology are economic superpowers. If the American energy and auto industries matched the level of excellence of NASA, the United States would be technologically untouchable.
I would bet that the vast majority of Canadians haven’t a clue what CSA is. The Canadian Space Agency is the Canadian equivalent of NASA, but the two organizations are hardly equivalent. CSA is a fine organization. They participate in the expensive practice of space exploration on a meagre budget; it is however the level of funding of national space organizations that determines the extent to which they may participate.
Here is an order of magnitude scale for the kind of aerospace related activity you can afford for a given amount of American dollars in 2011:
$100,000,000,000 Manned interplanetary mission
$10,000,000,000 Manned lunar mission
$1,000,000,000 Unmanned rocket for satellite placement
$100,000,000 Complete communications satellite or a 747 airplane
$10,000,000 Space payload (eg, Satellite Antenna)
$1,000,000 Basic helicopter
$100,000 Half a tank of gas for a 747 airplane
$10,000 One foot wide meteorite (collector’s item)
$1,000 Typical coach plane ticket with return
$100 Nike sneakers to jump as high as you can
$10 Movie ticket for Apollo 13
$1 Paper airplane
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)