Hanukkah is a Jewish holiday celebrating a miracle whereby oil sufficient for just one day burned for eight. Over this past week, an entirely different miracle took place: I, a father of two young girls watched two movies, none of which contained a single princess.
I really got my nerd on: I rented "Gravity" and then went to the theater to see "Interstellar". Both films feature a lot of physics, but they could not be more different. "Gravity" is a ninety minute expedition featuring orbital mechanics, while general relativity weaves its way through the three hours of "Interstellar".
You are probably expecting me to dissect these two films and expose all of their scientific inaccuracies. In truth, I enjoyed both of them immensely, but would like to address one major problem with each one.
Learning science is one of the hardest things a person can do. It often forces us to shift the way in which we see the world. The process is demanding, but is ultimately rewarding, because it allows us to interact with nature in a deeper, more meaningful way. If we continue down this road, we become empowered with the means to shape our environment - we become engineers.
Showing posts with label gravity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gravity. Show all posts
Friday, December 19, 2014
Tuesday, January 10, 2012
Hollywood Films Get Space Travel Wrong
As the space ship in the 1986 film Aliens moves towards a mysterious planet, the cosmonauts aboard
gaze suspiciously at the foreign body with their feet firmly pressed against
the ship’s floor. The sci-fi adventure
has barely begun, and already, the laws of physics have been ignored due to a
common imbalance in Hollywood: too much fi,
too little sci.
I want to be clear about something: I am an avid fan of
science fiction movies, whether or not they are set in space. In fact, I was thoroughly entertained by Aliens, the sequel to Alien - so much so that I watched it
recently for the second time.
As the film is set in the distant future, it is sensible
that several technological leaps have been made by mankind. I am comfortable with the intelligent robot
that is a part of the crew. I am intrigued
by the sensitive motion detection equipment that they use. What makes me queasy is when the most basic
law of motion is inexplicably defied.
When advances in technology occur, they lead to more robust
tools. However, these tools, no matter
how fantastic they are, must operate within the constraints of the universe. Otherwise put, technology is dynamic, but
exists within an operational framework that is static.
When a space travelling Sigourney Weaver stands up on the
surface of a ship, this implies that there is a set of contact forces between her
feet and the surface. A force, commonly
referred to as the normal force, is
pushing up onto her feet. Unless you are
currently undergoing a vertical loop on a jet airplane, or happen to be reading
this article while in a space orbit, the normal force is currently acting on
you.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)